On dim., 2015-01-11 at 09:18 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On sam., 2015-01-10 at 18:12 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Please upload xfce-session with the changes currently in svn to sid - > > or > > should I NMU? > > Funny, I've done the dch -r part on Nov 3, but apparently I forgot to > upload. > > I'll do it asap. > I've juste uploaded, but I'm a bit concerned about the following lintian warnings:
W: xfce4-session: maintainer-script-should-not-use-update-alternatives-remove postrm:4 N: N: update-alternatives --remove <alternative> foo is called in the postrm. N: This can be dangerous because at the time the postrm is executed foo has N: already been deleted and update-alternatives will ignore it while N: constructing its list of available alternatives. Then, if the N: /etc/alternatives symlink points at foo, update-alternatives won't N: recognize it and will mark the symlink as something site-specific. As N: such, the symlink will no longer be updated automatically and will be N: left dangling until update-alternatives --auto <alternative> is run by N: hand. N: N: update-alternatives --remove should be called in the prerm instead. N: N: Refer to Debian Policy Manual appendix F (Alternative versions of an N: interface - update-alternatives (from old Packaging Manual)) and the N: update-alternatives(8) manual page for details. N: N: Severity: normal, Certainty: certain N: N: Check: scripts, Type: binary N: W: xfce4-session: maintainer-script-should-not-use-update-alternatives-remove postrm:5 -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
