[ why are you loosing the Cc so that the answer just goes to me instead of also to Mattia? Since he'll maintain the catch-all-dicts-not-seperately-packaqged libreoffice-dictionaries ]
Hi, On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 05:46:21PM +0000, Esben Aaberg wrote: > I'm the release manager of the danich-hunspell-dictionary, and if it's a > no-brainer to maintain the .deb packet, I might consider it as a part of > the release procedure. (Currently I'm not using the Debian repository, and > have no previously experience building deb-packages). > Currently the binary oxt-file is our official release point. But we could If you do it correct (https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/, beginners totorial here: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/[1]) why noz? What is *NOT* ok is some "random" deb coming out of some "randmom" build sycript instead of a proper source package with debian/rules, .changes etc. And even then you'd need a "sponor" to upload it since you don't have the rights to do that. But that can be done. You can ook how the othe seperately packages dictionaries do it. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
