On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Moritz Both wrote:

> Don,
> 
> thank you for the response. I hope this bug report does not mutate
> to a support case embarrasingly ;) Anyway I'm confused.... your 
> source code is diffrent from mine... is there something newer than 
> 0.3.2-1 in stable? Is your code from 0.3.2-1b1 from sid?
> 
> moritz@eroski:~/src$ apt-get source spamass-milter
> [...]
> Holen: 1 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main spamass-milter 0.3.2-1 
> (dsc) [1.882 B]
> Holen: 2 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main spamass-milter 0.3.2-1 
> (tar) [155 kB]
> Holen: 3 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main spamass-milter 0.3.2-1 
> (diff) [15,1 kB]
> Es wurden 172 kB in 0 s geholt (526 kB/s).
> dpkg-source: Information: spamass-milter wird nach spamass-milter-0.3.2 
> extrahiert
> dpkg-source: Information: spamass-milter_0.3.2.orig.tar.gz wird entpackt
> dpkg-source: Information: spamass-milter_0.3.2-1.debian.tar.gz wird entpackt
> dpkg-source: Information: ignore_by_smtp_auth wird angewandt
> dpkg-source: Information: fix_spacing_in_received_header wird angewandt
> dpkg-source: Information: fix_header_char_cast wird angewandt
> dpkg-source: Information: add_ipv6_support wird angewandt
> dpkg-source: Information: auth_in_received wird angewandt
> 
> Now, spamass-milter.cpp says
> 
>                 string rec_header;
>                 rec_header=(string)"Received: from "+macro_s+" 
> ("+macro__+")\r\n\t";
>                 if (strlen(macro_auth_type)!=0) {
>                         rec_header+=(string)"(authenticated";
>                         if (strlen(macro_auth_ssf)!=0) {
>                                 rec_header+=(string)" bits="+macro_auth_ssf;
>                         }
>                         rec_header+=(string)")\r\n\t";
>                 }
>                 rec_header+=(string)"by "+macro_j+"("+macro_v+"/"+macro_Z+") 
> with "+
>                         macro_r+" id "+macro_i+"\r\n\t"+
>                         macro_b+"\r\n\t"+
>                         "(envelope-from "+assassin->from()+"\r\n";
> 
>                 debug(D_SPAMC, "Received header for spamc: %s", 
> rec_header.c_str());
>                 assassin->output(rec_header);
> 
> It is obvious that this code does not add the ; or ). To me it is not
> obvious why my dates are messed up. I added the -d ALL switch and wait
> for the next occurance in the next several hours.

Hrm. Actually, I see the problem now. For some crazy reason, the patches
(probably when I was updating to 3.3.2) got screwed up, and I didn't
catch this.

I'll fix them now.

-- 
Don Armstrong                      http://www.donarmstrong.com

Live and learn
or die and teach by example
 -- a softer world #625
    http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=625


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to