On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 09:11 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Have you done manual binary uploads to work around the failing buildd
> > architectures in the past?
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=elfutils&suite=unstable
>
> Yes, but the arm64 failure is new.
Might be a glibc upgrade issue fixed in upstream elfutils by:
commit c1e0fcb9311c1d136e20e658449367ad8b7f487d
Author: Kyle McMartin <k...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jun 9 21:06:26 2014 +0200
aarch64: use <sys/user.h> defined register structures
glibc now supplies these (compatible) structs instead of including the
kernel's <asm/ptrace.h> header, so let's use them. Annoyingly this will
cause new elfutils to FTBFS on old glibc, and vice versa. So include a
new configure check for the new struct names and use the old ones if
they are not avilable.
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <k...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <m...@redhat.com>
Which was added in elfutils-0.160 (latest is 0.161).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
