Thanks for your thorough response.

You were right, almost all the manual packages are metapackages and the rest oldlibs. I've commented out the Never-MarkAuto-Sections section in 01autoremove and that seems to give me the behavior that I want.

On 01.02.2015 20:13, Axel Beckert wrote:
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo

Hi,

Zane Peralta wrote:
Aptitude fails to mark *some* dependencies as automatically
installed when selecting a package in the Curses UI and pressing +
(to install).

I selected "kde-full" for installation and it marked other packages,
such as kde-standard, for manual installation as well. The expected
outcome is, of course, that the dependencies be marked as
automatically installed.
Yes and no. You may expect that, but at least in the case of kde-full,
this is actually a wanted feature enabled by default:

Dependecies of packages in the sections metapackages and oldlibs are
configured to not automatically become marked as "automatically
installed".

See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756816#27 for
the reasoning behind that behaviour.

You should be able to change this behaviour in
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove in the APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections
section. APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections so far is only documented in
/usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz

I've filed a bug report about documenting APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections
properly in the man page apt.conf(5) at https://bugs.debian.org/776790

It *appears* to me that it's the "hard" dependencies that are
correctly marked as automatically installed, and the recommendations
that are marked as manual (but this may be a red herring).
I doubt that. I suspect APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections to be reason.

I couldn't attach my state bundle because at 37MB it exceeds the
attachment size accepted by reportbug.
No need to do that at the moment.

Please check if all packages whose dependencies were not marked as
"automatically installed" are in the sections "metapackages" or
"oldlibs".

If that's the case, I'd just close that bug report.

Alternatively, if you're not happy with that, I can imagine two other
options:

* Reassign the bug report to apt to show that there are more users
   than just me unhappy with that default setting. I though doubt that
   this will help much.

* Keep it open as wishlist bug to make Aptitude ignore (in a sane and
   configurable way) APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections, maybe by just
   honouring Aptitude::Never-MarkAuto-Sections or by creating a new
   setting named Aptitude::Ignore-Never-MarkAuto-Sections and
   defaulting to yes.

   Reasoning behind this slightly subversive approach: It seems that
   primarily aptitude users are unhappy with that setting because of
   the completely different approach between aptitude and apt-get usage
   patterns (interactively fine-tune vs one-shot).

If there were also packages from other sections than those listed in
APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections, then we should keep that bug report as
is and just remove the "moreinfo" tag again. Then it's a real bug and
not just a matter of preferences and expectations.

                Regards, Axel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to