Hi, it's ok to rename the tool. In megatools 2.0 there will be only a single megatools binary called 'megatools' anyway, so there will be no conflict.
regards, o.j. 2015-02-02 16:02 GMT+01:00 Alberto Garcia <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:42:04PM +0100, fabrizio F. wrote: > >> Install the official MEGA client for Debian >> (https://mega.co.nz/#sync) then install megatools mpackage from >> Debian repositories. >> >> The megatools package cannot be installed (trying to overwrite >> '/usr/bin/megasync', which is also in package megasync 1.0.39) > > Thanks for the bug report. > > I guess the only choice if we want to allow the possibility to have > both packages installed at the same time is to rename the megasync > binary from the megatools package. > > I'm ccing Ondřej Jirman, the upstream developer of megatools, I would > like to know his opinion about this. > > Berto -- Ondřej Jirman, http://megous.com, 799 794 947 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
