Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> - Mon, 2 Feb 2015 19:47:01 +0100 >On 2015-02-02 Michel Briand <[email protected]> wrote: >> Package: libgnutls28-dev >> Version: 3.3.8-4~bpo70+1 >> Severity: important > >> package libgnutls28-dev:amd64 offers all required file to build an >> application with GnuTLS on Debian amd64 architecture. > >> Whereas libgnutls28-dev:i386 lacks some important files (libgnutls.a >> and the link libgnutls.so). > > >[...] >> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or >> ineffective)? > >> gcc -m32 > >> * What was the outcome of this action? > >> Link fails: > >> /usr/bin/ld.bfd.real: cannot find -lgnutls > >> * What outcome did you expect instead? > >> That the package libgnutls28-dev:i386 offers the same files as >> libgnutls28-dev:amd64 : > >> ll /usr/lib/*/libgnutls.so >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 nov. 18 >> 22:27 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so -> >> libgnutls-deb0.so.28.41.0 > >> ll /usr/lib/*/libgnutls.a >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2435010 nov. 18 >> 22:27 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutls.a >[...] > >Hello Michel, > >I have just downloaded libgnutls28-dev_3.3.8-4~bpo70+1_i386.deb and >libgnutls28-dev_3.3.8-4~bpo70+1_amd64.deb from debian to doublecheck >that the package is ok an complete. Both amd64 and i386 contain the >required files: >==================================================================== >ametzler@argenau:/tmp$ debdiff >libgnutls28-dev_3.3.8-4~bpo70+1_i386.deb >libgnutls28-dev_3.3.8-4~bpo70+1_amd64.deb [The following lists of >changes regard files as different if they have different names, >permissions or owners.] > >Files in second .deb but not in first >------------------------------------- >-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutls.a >-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutlsxx.a >-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/gnutls.pc >lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so -> >libgnutls-deb0.so.28.41.0 lrwxrwxrwx >root/root /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnutlsxx.so -> >libgnutlsxx.so.28.1.0 > >Files in first .deb but not in second >------------------------------------- >-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.a >-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutlsxx.a >-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/gnutls.pc >lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so -> >libgnutls-deb0.so.28.41.0 lrwxrwxrwx >root/root /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutlsxx.so -> >libgnutlsxx.so.28.1.0 > >Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) >------------------------------------------------ >Architecture: [-i386-] {+amd64+} >Installed-Size: [-2324-] {+2824+} >==================================================================== > >cu Andreas
Hello Andreas, yes I agree. I didn't looked into libgnutls28-dev:i386 file list because I can't install it along the amd64 version. apt-get install libgnutls28-dev:i386 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libgnutlsxx28 libtasn1-doc Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: libc++-dev:i386 libc++-helpers libc++1:i386 libgmp-dev:i386 libgmpxx4ldbl:i386 libgnutlsxx28:i386 libp11-kit-dev:i386 libtasn1-6-dev:i386 nettle-dev:i386 zlib1g-dev:i386 Suggested packages: clang:i386 libgmp10-doc:i386 libmpfr-dev:i386 guile-gnutls:i386 Recommended packages: libstdc++-dev:i386 libtasn1-doc:i386 The following packages will be REMOVED: libgnutls28-dev libp11-kit-dev libtasn1-6-dev nettle-dev The following NEW packages will be installed: libc++-dev:i386 libc++-helpers libc++1:i386 libgmp-dev:i386 libgmpxx4ldbl:i386 libgnutls28-dev:i386 libgnutlsxx28:i386 libp11-kit-dev:i386 libtasn1-6-dev:i386 nettle-dev:i386 zlib1g-dev:i386 0 upgraded, 11 newly installed, 4 to remove and 125 not upgraded. Need to get 3,594 kB of archives. After this operation, 8,152 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n Abort. It seems that packages are mutually exclusive. It's a blocker for me. I don't understand why the -dev package is specific to the architecture. I'd like to note that I can use Qt 4 to produce both amd64 and i386. I've installed libqt4-dev and both architecture dependent packages: libqtcore4:amd64 libqtcore4:i386. And everything is fine to build my application both for Debian amd64 and i386.... How can we go on with that ? Regards, Michel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
