On 2015-03-11 22:20, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote: >> There must not be a libgphoto2_port.so.10 symlink in the libgphoto2-port12 >> package. > > Why ? It was important when I did the tests.
Then something is seriously borked in your package. The new library is not a valid replacement for the old one (otherwise there would have been no need for a soname change) - a proper library transition is required and all packages depending on libgphoto2-port10 will need to be rebuild against the new one to pick up the new dependency. With the wrong symlink removed, you can coinstall libgphoto2-port10 and libgphoto2-port12, so packages that have not yet been rebuild will continue usabale. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
