Daniel Stone wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:03:19AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:28:41PM +0100, J??r??me Warnier wrote: > > > > I wonder if those files should really be conffiles at all, as it is > > > > asking for a lot of confirmations to override with new maintainer's > > > > version from anyone trying to upgrade from one version to another (for > > > > example Sarge to Etch), while those files have never been modified by > > > > the user. > > > > > > > > If they are not conffiles, they should not be in /etc either (they take > > > > 2.4M on my Sarge) by FHS. > > > > > > They are conffiles, yes. > > > > There's a real need to change the definition of conffiles > > then. > > Because having not configuration files like READMEs in /etc is not > > useful and in fact causes lots of problems. > > > > The definition of conffiles I'd like to use would be: > > A conffile is a file where the user changed anything from system > > default. > > > > With this definition READMEs and keybinding standard data files should > > be in /usr since the user didn't change them from the default. > > READMEs don't belong there in the most case, except in cases like > apache2 where you need one to navigate the directory. > > Users change keybindings. > > Daniel, running with an entirely custom keymap
Sure!! So you keep the standard keybinding in /usr and your one liners keybinding modifications in /etc. This way when there's a change in upstream keybindings you don't even have to merge them manually. (This will probably need some changes to the X server to source the upstream keybinding in /usr first and the /etc keybinding modifications second, but has lots of benefits in the long term) Prueba el Nuevo Correo Terra; Seguro, RĂ¡pido, Fiable.