Hi, On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:56:43 -0600 "Javier P.L." <[email protected]> wrote: > Package: ruby1.9.1 > Version: 1.9.3.484-2 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > According to: > > ruby1.9.1 (1.9.3.484-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * new strategy for Ruby version transitions: > - ruby1.9.1 depends on ruby > - libruby1.9.1 depends on ruby1.9.1 > * Drop alternatives entries. > > libruby1.9.1 now depends on ruby1.9.1. This causes than installations > of packages such us vim-nox (who depends on libruby) pull the whole ruby > programming language. > > It's my opinion it shouldn't be this way (unless the transition fixes > some important bugs). In my opinion it could be suggested but not > forced.
ruby1.9.1 doesn't exist anymore[1] so this will never be fixed in Debian. I think the equivalent bug for ruby 2.1 is fixed [2]. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/564445 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/747858 Thanks, James
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
