On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > It came to my mind if it would be legally correct, to mark translaions of > the Debian Constitution as translations and therefore as not legally valid?
The Debian Project is not a legal entity and the Debian Constitution is not a legal document, just a set of rules the Debian Project governs itself by. I think it is reasonable to have the constitution translated, as long as out-of-date translations are clearly marked. Currently they are not marked properly. I expect the outdatedness feature of the website needs to be adjusted to allow for per-page age preferences. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
