Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> writes: > Am Dienstag, den 31.03.2015, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Toby St Clere Smithe: >> The Fluid soundfont is split into two parts: GM and GS. This does not >> apply for timgm6mb, so such naming doesn't make sense. Both names are >> descriptive, and are of the general schema >> name-soundfont[-specialisation]. > > I see. > > Have you considered a soundfont-name[-special] schema like the ones the > fonts-* or browser-plugins-* packages use? The fluid-soundfont-* > packages do not follow this schema (yet?), but others doing it wrong > should not keep oneself from starting to do it right, right? ;)
Sure, indeed I have not. But I'm not sure right now it's worth the effort of migrating the names and dependencies. If we suddenly get a proliferation of soundfonts, then your suggestion is quite sensible. The proliferation is not happening soon: musescore-soundfont-gm is going away. I suppose another name could be tim-soundfont-gm, but that's not what people will search for (since here it's more widely known descriptively as TimGM6mb). Best, Toby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org