El jue, 15-12-2005 a las 17:34 -0500, Brandon Hale escribió: > Package: beagle > Version: 0.1.3-1 > > (Package stolen from arch tree since source is stuck in NEW limbo). > > beagle-dev package is incorrect. > libbeagle files should be split into libbeagle0 and libbeagle-dev > > libbeagle-dev will contain libbeagle.so (a symlink to libbeagle.so.0) > and the .pc file, include files, *.a, *.la > libbeagle0 should contain the rest of libbeagle. > > This allows for packages (eg, Nautilus, gnome-deskbar-applet) to be > linked against libbeagle without forcing users to have the full > beagle-dev pulled in at runtime as a depend.
That's not true, as libbeagle0 will need to depend in beagle. The library is using internal beagle libraries directly, so that cannot be split. IMHO, and that's the reason that made me at the end not to make libbeagle0 package, which I was preparing, making that package would be overkill and archive bloating. Thanks, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
