On 2015-04-27 17:18:23 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > So this is basically an upstream feature request. > > I don't think a feature request which you yourself phrase with > "should" validates RC-severity, even if it's a security related > feature. Hence downgrading the severity to "important".
Perhaps I should have said "must". A problem related to that is that it is said nowhere in lynx documentation that the revocation status is not checked. So, the user has a false impression of security. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
