Control: reopen -1
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Version: 2.5.23
[...]
> Jonathan Plamondon wrote:
> > Package: lintian
> > Version: 2.5.10.4
> [...]
> > * What led up to the situation?
> > We have a package using java 8
> > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> > ineffective)?
> > The warning are anoying.
> > * What was the outcome of this action?
> > The warning are anoying
> > * What outcome did you expect instead?
> > No warning.
[...]
> Besides that this issue already has been fixed fixed in Lintian since
> version 2.5.23 of June 2014 and the fix is included in Debian's
> current stable release.
I may have been to quick with closing this. The code introduced in
2.5.23 may have an off-by-one error, but it also may be on purpose
(the changelog entry sys "Catch uses of Java8 byte code"):
if ( $mver <= $MAX_BYTECODE->value('min-bytecode-version') - 1
or $mver
>= $MAX_BYTECODE->value('max-bytecode-existing-version')) {
# First public major version was 45 (Java1), latest
# version is 52 (Java8).
tag 'unknown-java-class-version', $jar_file,
"($class -> $mver)";
The ">=" in there likely should be just a ">" if Java 8 byte code
(i.e. for use with openjdk-8 from experimental) is fine. Or am I
misunderstanding the semantics of max-bytecode-existing-version?
Sylvestre: It'd be nice if you could have a look at this as you
introduced that code path in be04767b998558e2fbc637ddee45f675141e13ee.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
