Thank you Edmund. If you are a DD feel welcome to upload an NMU with such a workaround for now. Otherwise I will look into it next week (traveling/busy atm) to simply not build docs at all whenever only binary-arch build ahs thus removing those from straight build depends altogether. Cheers
On May 13, 2015 9:22:54 AM GMT+01:00, Edmund Grimley Evans <edmund.grimley.ev...@gmail.com> wrote: >The upstream documentation is a bit unclear, but I read somewhere that >statsmodels' documentation can be built with pandoc. > >On amd64 I was able to build statsmodels after uninstalling nodejs and >installing pandoc instead. > >A package called "pandoc" sounds like a more obvious choice for >building documentation than a package called "nodejs" so I suggest you >replace the "nodejs" Build-Depends in debian/control with "pandoc". > >There are several architectures that have pandoc but not nodejs: > >https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=nodejs&suite=sid >https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pandoc&suite=sid > >There is currently one architecture, kfreebsd-i386, that has nodejs >but not pandoc, but that is probably just a temporary problem as >kfreebsd-i386 has always has it in the past: > >https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=pandoc&arch=kfreebsd-i386 > >If you did want to insert a work-around for the temporary problem then >you would presumably replace > > nodejs, > >with something like: > > nodejs [kfreebsd-i386] | pandoc, -- Sent from a phone which beats iPhone. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
