On 22.05.2015 19:44, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > The classes in the two jars are identical, shipping two jars in one > package would be a waste of space. > > This dichotomy between ASL/LGPL artifacts is absurd in my opinion, > upstream should ship the library once, simply state it's dual licensed > and let the users decide the license they want for their work.
Absolutely agreed. I also consider this to be an upstream issue in the first place. > As a convenience we should probably provide both Maven artifacts (but > with a symlink to avoid the duplication of the jar), that will simplify > the usage of the package (no more substitution rules). That's a good idea. Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
