On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:01:26PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:44:24AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun May 17, 2015 at 22:18:52 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > DSA (also cc'd): What's the virtualization setup with x86-grnet-01, > > > brahms and binet? Is there a difference with babin, which managed > > > to build the i386 binaries? Are the underlying virtualization hosts > > > running jessie too? > > > > ganeti, using qemu for all architectures. The underlying virtualization > > hosts for x86-grnet-01 and brahms run jessie, binet's virtualization > > host still runs wheezy. All VMs are bootstraped by DSA with the same > > script, which is available at [1]. After the bootstrapping is done, > > buildd maintainers take over and setup the buildd on the VM. > > It seems to be reproducible on barriere.debian.org: > > t/op/time ..................................................... # Failed test > 2 - very basic times test at op/time.t line 33 > FAILED at test 2 > > More digging needed.
The test calls the times(2) system call, expecting to see the real issue can be reduced to: dom@barriere:~$ time yes > /dev/null ^C real 0m2.768s user 0m0.000s sys 0m2.764s We'd expect to instead 'yes' take 'user' time, like this: dom@himalia:~$ time yes > /dev/null ^C real 0m2.686s user 0m2.656s sys 0m0.032s This is rather strange; any ideas from DSA? Cheers, Dominic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org