Hi!
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 19:51:57 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-01 05:05:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 - patch
> > On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >>> Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
> >>> The one before which is in jessie works fine.
> >>> I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix
> >>
> >> gparted needs a newer udisks2, see #782838. Proposed patch attached.
> >
> >> diff -Nru gparted-0.19.0/debian/control gparted-0.19.0/debian/control
> >> --- gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2014-06-11 14:50:55.000000000 +0000
> >> +++ gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2015-04-26 16:02:28.000000000 +0000
> >> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> >>
> >> Package: gparted
> >> Architecture: any
> >> -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
> >> +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, udisks2 (>= 2.1.5-1)
> >> Suggests: xfsprogs, reiserfsprogs, reiser4progs, jfsutils, ntfs-3g,
> >> dosfstools, mtools, yelp, kpartx, dmraid, dmsetup, gpart
> >> Description: GNOME partition editor
> >
> > As pointed out in #783397 this fix is incorrect. The correct fix is to
> > use a Breaks, so that there's no unnecessary Depends introduced.
> As I can see, gparted doesn't break udisks2.
It seems to break in combination with older udisks2.
> Do you mean to add
>
> Breaks: udisks2 (<< 2.1.5)
>
> to gparted's debian/control?
Yes.
Thanks,
Guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
