On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:06:03PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Antonio, > > > Am Montag, den 25.05.2015, 10:00 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 02:37:37PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > Package: ruby-activesupport > > > Version: 4.1.10-1 > > > Severity: normal > > > > Having the package `ruby-activesupport-3.2` (3.2.19-1) installed, > > > installing the package `ruby-activesupport` (4.1.10-1) fails. > > > > > > Entpacken von ruby-activesupport (2:4.1.10-1) ... > > > dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs > > > /var/cache/apt/archives/ruby-activesupport_2%3a4.1.10-1_all.deb > > > (--unpack): > > > Versuch, »/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/active_support.rb« zu > > > überschreiben, welches auch in Paket ruby-activesupport-3.2 3.2.19-1 ist > > > dpkg-deb: Fehler: Unterprozess einfügen wurde durch Signal > > > (Datenübergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe)) getötet > > > > > > (Tries to overwrite `/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/active_support.rb` also > > > present in package ruby-activesupport-3.2 3.2.19-1.) > > > > > > Please add the corresponding lines to `Breaks` and `Conflicts` meta > > > data(?). > > > > ruby-activesupport used to have Conflicts/Breaks against > > ruby-activesupport-3.2; but ruby-activesupport-3.2 is only present in > > wheezy, and the `ruby` from jessie already conflicts with it so > > ruby-activesupport-3.2 should have been removed during some upgrade. > > I see. > > > How up to date is your system? > > It’s up to date. But as I still have some RoR 3.2 applications, I put > the RoR/Active* packages on hold to stay at 3.2.
In that case you should not install ruby-activesupport. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
