On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:22:07PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2015-06-03 13:30:21 -0400, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:03:42AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> >> On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:05, [email protected] said:
> >>
> >> > Thank you. I think it makes sense.
> >>
> >> I don't think so. GnuPG uses a locking mechanism to avoid that several
> >> instances of gpg and friends start gpg-agent. Thus watching the socket
> >> file and starting gpg-agent on a connect attempt won't work too well.
> >
> > I wasn't aware of the new agent standard socket and the on-demand loading
> > you mentioned. I agree that's the better approach than using a systemd
> > unit.
>
> Should we mark this bug as wontfix, then, or close it?
I'm fine either way.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
