Am 11.06.2015 um 14:04 schrieb Thomas Lange: >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:57:30 +0200, Moritz Struebe >>>>>> <[email protected]> said: > > Am 11.06.2015 um 13:13 schrieb Thomas Lange: > >>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:59:33 +0200, Moritz Struebe > <[email protected]> said: > >> > fai-divert currently fails silently if dpkg-divert is not available. > Thus > >> > changes made, e.g. in updatebase [1], are not reverted as expected. > >> Why is dpkg-divert not available? If dpkg-divert is not available, > >> fai-divert will not do any changes, so there are no changes to revert. > > > fai-divert does not, but ubdatebase does, or rather relies on fai-divert > > working [1]. Didn't check for other calls to fai-divert. > I see. updatebase changes policy-rc.d. But why does reverting this > change not work? dpkg-divert sould always be available, since it's > part of dpkg, which must be available in every Debian(based) > installation. >
Seems like our issue was caused by something before 591a1664, but only showed up now. Yet if there is a check whether dpkg-divert is available, IMO it should fail horribly none the less. Morty
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
