On 06/16/15 at 02:12pm, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:40:03AM +0200, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote: > > > Following Berto's recommendation, I repackaged mutt-kz as a mutt's > > alternative. I had to rebase several patches applied to mutt and it > > seems to work OK. > > > > Last Saturday I uploaded the package again: > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/mutt-kz > > The checksums don't match, you need to create and upload again all > files every time you change something. The dscverify tool will help > you with that.
OK. > > My opinion is that some of the headers should not be included: > > Recommends: default-mta | mail-transport-agent, locales, mime-support, > libsasl2-modules > Suggests: urlview, aspell | ispell, gnupg, mixmaster, openssl, > ca-certificates > Conflicts: mutt-utf8 > Replaces: mutt-utf8 > Provides: imap-client, mail-reader > > mutt-kz has a hard dependency on mutt, and mutt already includes those > headers, so there's no need to duplicate them here. Yes. It makes sense. > > Other than that, the package looks much better now. I still haven't > checked all little details, though, but I think this is almost ready > for uploading. > > Do we have an ITP bug for mutt-kz? I haven't found it. I haven't posted a ITP bug. I'll do it. Thanks Berto! vmjl > > Berto > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
