Kernel 3.18.16 gives me exactly the same error. At the moment, I need to do some work stuff, but I'll be doing more experiments ASAP.
2015-06-23 0:42 GMT+03:00 Дмитрий Нестеркин <undelb...@gmail.com>: > I've downloaded 3.18.16 longterm kernel and plan to compile it on my > system. > Linux Mint (which is OK) uses kernel 3.13 and fedora 22 uses kernel 4.0 > (also ok). > In fact there is a lot of UAS/USB bugs reported for kernel 3.16 (and some > for 3.15 and 3.17). > > Controllers you mentioned are USB 3.0. My drive is definitely USB 2.0. > However, if it looks like a duck, swim like a duck and quacks like a > duck... I'll definitely need to try new kernel. > > 2015-06-22 21:34 GMT+03:00 Thomas Schmitt <scdbac...@gmx.net>: > >> Hi, >> >> > I have found some interesting discussion about UAS bugs in kernel 3.16: >> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2014/07/msg00318.html >> >> UAS ... google ... wikipedia ... >> Well, it would be the natural way to perform SG_IO with a USB >> device. Burn programs issue SCSI commands and UAS is designed >> for transporting them. Wikipedia has: >> "Version 3.18-rc4 of the Linux kernel disables buggy UAS >> implementation in xHCI host controllers Etron EJ168, >> ASMedia ASM1042,[19] and VIA VL80x.[20]" >> >> But i understand that UAS is quite a new protocol. >> Is your drive's USB controller young enough ? (Actually >> i assume the drive is SATA or IDE and the box has a >> USB-SATA or USB-IDE bridge bridge.) >> >> >> > An here comes the output from my kern.log: >> > Jun 22 15:12:02 D-NESTERKIN kernel: [ 1.508233] usb 3-2: Product: >> PLEXTOR >> > USB Storage Adapter >> >> They really give few clue about age and version of the >> drive-side USB controller. >> I googled for "PLEXTOR USB Storage Adapter" "UAS" and found >> nearly nothing. Descriptions of UAS refer to hard disks and >> SSDs, rather than optical drives. But - as stated - i expect >> it to depend on the USB-SATA or USB-IDE controller of the >> drive box. >> >> >> In any case, recent changes in USB are obvious suspects. >> Now i'm curious whether the working and non-working Linuxes >> show a pattern with kernel revisions. >> >> >> Have a nice day :) >> >> Thomas >> >> > > > -- > С уважением, > Нестеркин Дмитрий > -- С уважением, Нестеркин Дмитрий