On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 08:31 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2015-06-14, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Attached is a patch to enable support for the Jetson Tegra K1 board via a > > new > > u-boot-tegra package. It is based on the experimental-2015.07 branch of > > git. I > > can push it myself if you prefer but I thought I'd best have it reviewed > > first. > > Looks fine to me. Feel free to commit it!
Thanks, will do (maybe not until the weekend though). > One question this brings up, though: According to wikipedia, there is > also a 64-bit variant; would that use a different u-boot? I _think_ (and I'm only 90% sure) that the 64-bit SoC is called the Tegra X1, rather than K1. I'm not aware yet of a 64-bit dev board with this SoC though I suppose there will be something eventually. > All the u-boot packages are marked "multi-arch: same", but if there's > the possibility of both an armhf and amd64 u-boot-tegra package > containing different builds, maybe we'll need to reconsider how to > handle multi-arch with u-boot packaging... Hrm, so u-boot-tegra:armhf and u-boot-tegra:arm64 cannot be installed at the same time? even if the files which they contain do not overlap? They shouldn't contain overlapping files[0] which I thought was enough to allow multiple arches to be installed. [0] or at least I think it's unlikely any 64-bit board will be called precisely "jetson-tk1" (-tx1, maybe...) > > I'm not entirely happy with the requirement (documented in the README) to > > use > > L4T to do the flashing but I've not yet worked out a fully working > > alternative > > (I think something must be possible using some combination of tegracrm and > > cbotimage both of which are in Debian, but I've not figured out the exact > > steps > > yet). > > You could perhaps include a TODO item in the README (or a separate TODO > file); that might stir someone else to submit improved docs... A good idea, thanks. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
