On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > I think this makes sense, but it can be equally changing: eg we might want to > provide version numbers too...
That would be a backwards-compatible change though and wouldn't break anything if added. > I'm not sure "we" will ever care about those, as in, I rather envision a > future where unreproducible packages are not part of testing nor stable… The problem is that an upload to stable could introduce unreproducibility and we should catch that. I guess a future where the archive enforces reproducibility is what we want. > To say it differently: I'm not sure reproducible-tracker.json will be the data > source in the future... Ok. > it does! Now I just wonder whether to reassign this bug to qa.d.o (and usertag > it jenkins.d.n) or keep it here... (or maybe close and file a new one?) Lets close and start again. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
