On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:10:45 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
> maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
> break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
> against these packages.
There don't seem to be any reverse dependencies in Debian:
smcv@coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n kytea
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
kytea | 0.4.6+dfsg-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386,
i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libkytea-dev | 0.4.6+dfsg-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libkytea0 | 0.4.6+dfsg-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
Maintainer: Koichi Akabe <[email protected]>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
