Hi, I already wrote to AT&T only to get a negative response. It may be usefull if you send them a polite note for the same. In view of this impasse you may close the bug if you like. I was under the impression that it is a seperate driver and didn't realise it was in the form of a patch.
regards b thomas On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:26:57PM +0000, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > Not clear to me that this is okay, since the code is *only* useful as > a patch to gs. If you can get a statement from the gs authors that it > is okay, that might be satisfactory. Otherwise it seems safer to just > continue to whine to AT&T about how stupid they are being in licensing > a patch using a license incompatible to that of the thing it patches! > -- > Barak A. Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hamilton Institute & Dept Comp Sci, NUI Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland > http://www-bcl.cs.nuim.ie/~barak/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
