Control: tags 791323 + unreproducible On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:15:01 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote: > - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the > library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the > library.
I suspect they are not API: they seem to be weak symbols for template instantiations: 0000000000000000 DF *UND* 0000000000000000 GLIBCXX_3.4.21 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_create(unsigned long&, unsigned long) 00000000000bf240 w DF .text 0000000000000138 Base std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> > >::_M_get_insert_unique_pos(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) 00000000000bf5e0 w DF .text 000000000000028a Base std::map<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, int, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> > >::operator[](std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) 00000000000bf1f0 w DF .text 0000000000000048 Base std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> > >::_M_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >*) 00000000000bf380 w DF .text 0000000000000254 Base std::_Rb_tree<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int>, std::_Select1st<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >, std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> > >::_M_get_insert_hint_unique_pos(std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const, int> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) Using "unreproducible" to mean "probably not a bug, but someone else should have a look before this is closed". I hope that's OK. S