>>>>> "Don" == Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> writes:
Don> On Sun, 16 Aug 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> What about "just" adding Keith's proposal to the ballot, and let >> the Condorcet magic act? Don> This has sort of been my plan; I just have not had enough spare Don> cycles in the past few weeks (grant deadlines) to have the time Don> necessary to work through Keith's plan and shift it into a Don> specific patch to policy. If you add Keith's proposal as well as an explanation of our technical objection to what debian-policy came up with it, I might even vote for it. If you were to add a recommendation to ballot option B that under 6.1.5 we ask debian-policy to consider Keith's proposal, I'd prefer that to the current text. If you simply add a ballot option for Keith's proposal without text in the decision explaining our technical objection to option A/B, I'll disagree with it as strongly as I can. (Read, I'd probably feel strongly enough to fight the issue in other fora if I was in the rough here). While we're not overturning anything in the sense of an override here, I think we owe an explanation for our actions, and I feel really strongly about that.