Hi, On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Guido Günther wrote (21 Aug 2015 08:37:53 GMT) : > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 09:08:46AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > >> Felix Geyer wrote (20 Aug 2015 09:18:59 GMT) : > >> > The deny rules aren't strictly necessary but they silence those > >> > (harmless) denials. > >> > >> Thanks for the clarification. I don't think that silencing harmless denials > >> qualifies for a stable pu. > > > Great. Can one of you add this to #796088 - I did but it might make > > sense if somebody with more apparmor skills does. > > The path I would prefer is: submit an updated debdiff that does not > contain these bonus "deny" rules. I could prepare it if we agree on > that, assuming the current state of this stable pu is in Vcs-Git. > > But if someone else disagrees and prefers to argue in favour of > including these changes in the stable pu, feel free to do so :)
I'm fine with this as well. The debian/jessie branch on alioth is up to date. Cheers, -- Guido
