> It's not as easy as compiling the code with clang-3.7. You would also > have to patch afl-clang-fast to execute the right compiler, and get > Depends right. > > I don't think it's worth the effort. > > I'd rather wait until 3.7 is the default; and in the mean time remove > afl arm64 binaries from the archive. > > But of course, it's up to Daniel.
Much brush against the grain for the compiler wrappers to save an architecture over an temporarily gap ... I'm tending to stick to the default system, although arm would be really missed for a while. I'm fixing the other missing stuff today, let's talk again, then. Maybe we could prepare another patched version for experimental on the top ... Daniel -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8
