Okay, point taken. But now that it is renamed, should I really rename
it again?

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:25:34 +0200
Julien Cristau <jul...@cristau.org> wrote:

> That still doesn't make sense. You shouldn't rename the dev package, but if 
> you do it shouldn't include a version...
> 
> On August 27, 2015 11:11:52 PM CEST, Riley Baird 
> <bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch> wrote:
> >> libassa3.5-5-dev was renamed to libassa-3.5-5-dev, which makes
> >reverse
> >> deps unbuildable.  Please revert that change, there's no reason to
> >> rename the -dev package.
> >
> >The only reverse dep is granule, which I've prepared a new version of.
> >I'm waiting for it to be uploaded.
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Attachment: pgpA_rzuFzAmM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to