On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:30:56AM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote: > > In a quick test, I do not see any problems introduced by the > > patch, and for "recent" gnutls, it is able to connect to > > https://contributors.debian.org but it does not address openssl and > > less-than-bleeding-edge gnutls(*). So I think it will work (for me) > > as a starting point, and for Debian as an interim patch. > > Hello, > > well yes, i must admit my gnutls/SSL programming knowledge is/was next > to nothing, so i am sure my patch might be improved. This was really > intended as a fix for the recent version, nothing more. And as lynx in > Debian is build against GNUTLS: If we would (at least for Debian) > apply the patch for the version currently in sid, at least some people > may benefit from this.
I think we're agreeing here. > > > > At the moment I'm working off an (older) backlog for vile, > > thinking to work on lynx's backlog next. > > > > (*) in an earlier check, I found that "older" w3m and links > > worked, using openssl but elinks did not. So I have to do some > > investigation. > > > > I will try to come up with support for rehandshake support for openssl > as well (if actually needed, maybe openssl does handle this completely > different). thanks (I've a couple days more on vile, but am aware there are several fixes suggested for lynx -- as well as unresolved issues -- all take time). -- Thomas E. Dickey <[email protected]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
