Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> writes: > > Hi, > > That's not the same package. The one that I'm packaging has not only the > .ttf files, but also .eot, .svg, .woff and .woff2, plus .css, .less and > .scss files. All of these are needed for the web developers. See this > Git repository: > > https://github.com/choffmeister/roboto-fontface-bower
Yes I saw that, but I think its not the actual upstream of Roboto fonts. See ¹ That is why I replied to your ITP :-). ¹ http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/2015-May/015896.html > > If you wish to drop the generation of fonts-roboto from the > fonts-android package, then good. I could add a transition package for > it, or rename the binary as fonts-roboto, if you think that's a more > appropriate way. Whatever happen, we would need the > fonts-roboto-fontface package to be in the archive first, so it can take > over the old package. I would like to know the teams opinion here, as the upstream for Roboto fonts is different from the roboto-fontface-bower. @pabs any comments/suggestion. > > I also need to package fonts-materialdesignicons from here: > > https://github.com/Templarian/MaterialDesign-Webfont > > Do you think I should join the pkg-fonts group to maintain these fonts > under the group? That would be great. Most of fonts in Debian are maintained under the fonts team. (most not all there are exceptions). > > Note that all of these are for the OpenStack dashboard (aka Horizon), > which needs all of these as embedded fonts in its web pages. Yeah, we already have couple of webfonts under pkg-fonts team, though there is no strict policy yet we place them under /usr/share/fonts/type where type can be ttf, otf, woff, svg eot, etc. And less/css/scss files under /usr/share/fonts-package. As an example you can have a look at fonts-font-awesome source, which is also used by owncloud.