Le Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:25:54PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > > > I'm hereby proposing the following diff for point 2, as a discussion > starter: > > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml > index ee1e9f4..83e4057 100644 > --- a/policy.sgml > +++ b/policy.sgml > @@ -8192,14 +8192,18 @@ Reloading <var>description</var> configuration...done. > </p> > > <p> > - Packages can, to be compatible with Debian additions to some window > - managers that do not support the FreeDesktop standard, also provide a > + Applications that are <em>not</em> registered in the desktop menu can > optionally provide a > <em>Debian menu</em> file, following the <em>Debian menu policy</em>, > which can be found in the <tt>menu-policy</tt> files in the > <tt>debian-policy</tt> package. It is also available from the Debian > web mirrors at <tt><url name="/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/" > id="http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/"></tt>. > </p> > + > + <p> > + Applications that are registred in the desktop menu shall not also > + provide a <em>Debian menu</em> file for the same application. > + </p> > </sect> > > <sect id="mime">
Hi Didier, thanks a lot to you and the TC for bringing this issue to a conclusion. I think that your patch is good. Minor nitpick: the Policy does not use the word "shall" much - I guess it is to help non-native speakers like me. If I understand well, it means "must" ? In that case, I propose to replace it by "must". Have a nice day, Charles -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan