On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 07:19:00PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: blhc
> Version: 0.04+20140813+gitac2b8ce-1
> Severity: minor
>
> When you run blhc against afl build log[0], it reports:
>
> LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): rm -f afl-gcc afl-as afl-fuzz afl-showmap as 
> afl-g++ afl-clang afl-clang++ *.o *~ a.out core core.[1-9][0-9]* *.stackdump 
> test .test test-instr .test-instr0 .test-instr1
>
> This is of course false positive: rm(1) doesn't need any LDFLAGS to do its
> job. :-)

Hello,

Sorry for the late reply. Should be fixed in 3b0570 [1].

Regards
Simon

[1]: 
http://ruderich.org/simon/gitweb/?p=blhc/blhc.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b0570352219e1c0cc5d15fa07892444c2561f11
-- 
+ privacy is necessary
+ using gnupg http://gnupg.org
+ public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to