On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:55:53PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > Andrew, are you an active user of ipmasq? Since I do not use it any > more I am putting this on RFA. Unfortunately, all previous volunteers > failed to follow their words. Here is my take on this bug below. > > On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 01:49:11AM -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is kind of related to this bug, so I've reopened it. > > > > I have an interface with multiple addresses assigned to it with the ip(8) > > command. These additional addresses aren't reported with ifconfig(8). > > > > ipofif(8) doesn't report these addresses either, so the rules generated by > > ipmasq do not allow traffic to/from these additional addresses. > > > > e.g.: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/ipmasq/rules$ ip a s dev eth0 > > 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 > > link/ether 00:08:02:52:49:d7 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 69.12.141.94/24 brd 69.255.255.255 scope global eth0 > > inet 69.12.141.92/24 brd 69.12.141.255 scope global secondary eth0 > > inet 69.12.141.93/24 brd 69.12.141.255 scope global secondary eth0 > > inet6 fe80::208:2ff:fe52:49d7/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > Yes, if you have fancy network setting, you need to use ip command under > 2.6, I guess. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/ipmasq/rules$ /sbin/ifconfig eth0 > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:08:02:52:49:D7 > > inet addr:69.12.141.94 Bcast:69.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > > inet6 addr: fe80::208:2ff:fe52:49d7/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:1691069 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:1583279 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > RX bytes:1158411006 (1.0 GiB) TX bytes:1001610728 (955.2 MiB) > > Yep. Good-old ipconfig only understands eth0 on 69.12.141.94. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/ipmasq/rules$ /usr/sbin/ipofif eth0 > > 69.12.141.94 > > That is quite natural since ipmasq is build around ifconfig etc. > > ipofif is nothing but: > > /sbin/ifconfig $1 | sed -n -e'/inet addr:/s/^.*inet addr:\([0-9.]*\).*$/\1/p' > > So, if this is the case, this bug is wontfix if I maintain this package. > > If you are willing to propose proper alternative, it will be > interesting. You can adopt this :-) This is my pre-approval seeing > your competent bug report. > > But considering that change will change package dependency, I think you > should make new package ipmasq2 based on that script. Then you can also > drop complicated 2.0, 2.2 kernel support and clean up code for sure. > Oh, if you care to recreate this package, please make this work without > /usr mounted. That will make many issues of NFS mount. >
Sounds like a fun challenge, I might just take you up on it once I get a bit more settled in my new location. regards Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
