Hi Ralf, thanks for coming back on this so quickly!
Quoting Ralf Treinen (2015-10-01 09:10:21) > I am unable to reproduce the bug you reported with the cudf file that you > attached to the bug report: > > $ aspcud problem-with-experimental.cudf solution1.cudf > [ noisy output omitted ] > > $ aspcud problem-with-experimental.cudf solution2.cudf "-new" > [ noisy output omitted ] > > $ ls -l solution2.cudf > -rw-r--r-- 1 rt users 27954 Oct 1 09:01 solution2.cudf > > $ head solution2.cudf > package: amd64%3asbuild-build-depends-boinc-dummy > version: 6483 > installed: true > > package: amd64%3adpkg > version: 10325 > installed: true > > package: amd64%3alogin > version: 20156 > > This is aspcud 1:1.9.1-2 on amd64. > > Did you send in the right the cudf file ? I think so. To be sure, lets try to reproduce this in a clean chroot: $ sudo debootstrap unstable debian-unstable http://httpredir.debian.org/debian $ sudo chroot debian-unstable apt-get install aspcud --no-install-recommends $ curl "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800526;msg=5att=2"; | unxz | sudo tee debian-unstable/problem.cudf > /dev/null $ sudo chroot debian-unstable aspcud /problem.cudf /solution.cudf $ head debian-unstable/solution.cudf package: amd64%3asbuild-build-depends-boinc-dummy version: 6483 installed: true package: amd64%3adpkg version: 10325 installed: true package: amd64%3alogin version: 20156 $ sudo chroot debian-unstable aspcud /problem.cudf /solution.cudf -new $ head debian-unstable/solution.cudf FAIL Furthemore, since aspcud has no problem finding a solution without the packages from experimental, I tried to bisect the experimental packages to see if there was some package in there causing trouble. But bisection does not work. It seems to be a combination of packages causing this. Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
