A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to binary is a kind of format change On Oct 2, 2015 6:02 AM, "Norbert Preining" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What is the relationship between the googlefonts repos and the google > > fonts repo? It seems a bit weird to have two places for the same stuff. > > Looking at the repos, the google fonts repo contains the built, ie > ready made files, while the googlefonts repo the sources. > > Not that this is an explanation - but just for understanding what is where. > > > > BTW I believe that Debian must rename all OFL-RFN fonts (just as with > > > Firefox.) > > Why? If the fonts are taken as is it seems to be fine, I don't se > any need for name change. The RFN clause is about *changed* fonts, > as far as I remember. > > Norbert > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info > JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer > GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >
