Hi Gianfranco,

> I sponsored the package

Thank you again for all your help.

> (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is 
> nice to be subscribed)

I have subscribed to debian-science as well.

> However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags in a future 
> release:
> CXXFLAGS missing (-fPIE):
> LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,now)
> CFLAGS missing (-fPIE):
> LDFLAGS missing (-fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,now)
> you can see the full log here [1] or by using blhc tool
> 
> 
> [1] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#unstable/polyml/5.5.2-1/blhc

I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling all 
hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script requires gcc 
and libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have added those as 
dependencies for polyml.

Should I push my changes to debian-science/packages/polyml.git (especially 
since that’s the repository in debian/control)? Also, going forwards, if I want 
to get a new version uploaded, do I need to file a new RFS “bug” against 
sponsorship-requests, or should I instead just email debian-science asking for 
a team upload (subject to a review of the package)?

James

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to