Thanks Piotr,

One quick comment can be found inline below.

On 10/19/2015 11:54 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
Hi Ross,

[Ross Gammon, 2015-10-19]
-XS-Python-Version: all
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), python (>= 2.3.5-11), python-all-dev
-Build-Depends-Indep: python-setuptools, python-support (>= 0.6.4)
+X-Python-Version: >= 2.3.5-11

please use 'X-Python-Version: >= 2.3', this field is about upstream
Python version, not really about our interpreter version

+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), python, python-all-dev
+Build-Depends-Indep: python-setuptools, dh-python

that's OK, we don't need versioned python anymore, but it's NMU, so
better leave it as it was

  Standards-Version: 3.8.1
  Vcs-Git: git://git.geekbu.de/python-flickrapi/
  Vcs-Browser: http://git.geekbu.de/?p=python-flickrapi.git
diff -u python-flickrapi-1.2/debian/rules python-flickrapi-1.2/debian/rules
--- python-flickrapi-1.2/debian/rules
+++ python-flickrapi-1.2/debian/rules
@@ -1,14 +1,11 @@
  #!/usr/bin/make -f
-PYVERS=$(shell pyversions -r)
  d=debian/python-flickrapi

  build:

  clean:
        dh_testdir
-       for python in $(PYVERS); do  \
-           $$python setup.py clean; \
-       done
+       python setup.py clean
        rm -f `find $(CURDIR) -name '*.pyc'`
        rm -rf build-stamp build
        rm -rf $(d)
@@ -20,9 +17,7 @@
        dh_testroot
        dh_installdirs
        set -e; \
-       for python in $(PYVERS); do \
-           $$python setup.py install --root=$(d) --prefix=/usr ;\
-       done
+       python setup.py install --root=$(d) --prefix=/usr

  binary-indep: build install
        dh_testdir
@@ -31,7 +26,7 @@
        dh_installchangelogs
        dh_compress -X.py
        dh_fixperms

please remove these changes, they're not related to pysupport removal

I found I had to make these changes to get it to build because it was picking up NULL for the PYVERS. But maybe if I make the other changes you suggest, the problem will be solved for me (or I will come back for more help).


-       dh_pysupport
+       dh_python2

this one is perfectly valid


PS thanks for you work!


Cheers,

Ross

Reply via email to