On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:27:12AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Kurt Roeckx] > > But all those packages have to be fixed sooner or later. I hope > > people will go and fix this themself. But I'll file bugs after they > > uploaded it and it failed.
> Yes, a fix need to be inserted. But I have a hard time figuring out
> how to fix it in a way that make the package still build in sarge.
> Running the xlibs-split script gave me this list:
> libx11-dev
> libxmu-dev
> libxt-dev
> x-dev
> But I do not know how to express 'xlibs-dev' or
> 'libx11-dev,libxmu-dev,libxt-dev,x-dev'. Can you help to provide a
> patch solving this while still being buildable in sarge and unstable?
$ madison -s stable libx11-dev libxmu-dev libxt-dev x-dev
libx11-dev | 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 | stable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libxmu-dev | 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 | stable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libxt-dev | 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 | stable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386,
ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
x-dev | 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 | stable | all
$
How about "libx11-dev, libxmu-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev"? :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
