Hi, * Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro> [2015-10-29 17:09:36 CET]: > If a developer has their own XMPP account elsewhere or simply doesn't > want to use it, any requests to be in their roster will simply not be > responded to. Should we provide an option to automatically reject > requests sent to accounts that are not used or automatically give some > reply scripted by the developer?
I think a forward possibility would be useful. The LDAP already has a field for Jabber ID. I guess it might make sense to forward things to there; I'm not sure if it's possible to send stuff back somehow then though. Also, if it gets implemented that stuff gets forwarded there people should be explicitly made aware that this will happen beforehand so that they can decide if they want to remove the entry from ldap or not. Maybe a flag might make sense - or a new field that explicitly states "xmpp messages forwarded to" like we have for "email forwarded to" right now? Just some thoughts, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los | Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los |
