積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > >>>>> "JBR" == Justin B Rye <justin.byam....@gmail.com> writes: > > JBR> any of them? If so, what did you think? > > Yes I did but they are all too technical.
Is it really so difficult to look at an alternative version of a message and tell us if it makes it any clearer? *Something* made you think it was talking about removing mysql, and that something is either a problem with the way it's written or a problem with the way you're reading it. Help us narrow that down a bit! > One may say that just telling the user to have a look at the script that > is about to be executed is technical too... yes. That's not the problem. The problem is that your idea for how to fix a confusing text is to make it longer and more complicated instead of clearer. > But I guess you guys aren't willing to have the program make any > outright promises about 'don't worry' and what it won't do... Well, do the words NO WARRANTY ring any bells? -- JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package