Am Wednesday, 2015-11-25 um 19:43:05 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: Hi
> Thanks for reporting this issue. > > Did you set the option "ea"? I tried that, but it seems to be ignored ... :-( > Comments in AppleVolumes.default seem to indicate that by default native > filesystem handling is tried first, with fallback to AppleDouble > directories. My guess is that filesystem handling also didn't work with > older kernel, but failed more gracefully than with the newer kernel. > > If you have .AppleDouble dirs allower then I guess that confirms my > theory - then try explicitly set ea:ad. Seems to be ignored, it does not change anything. > Or, if you don't really need to preserve the legacy Mac part of files > (you probably don't if you serve same data also with Samba) then try set > it to ea:none (which might also speed things up a bit. Also tried that, it does not change anything. > > Is this problem fixed in netatalk 2.2.5? > > Not sure. Please do try, and report back your findings to this > bugreport: http://snapshot.debian.org/package/netatalk/ Are these packages jessie-compatible? I don't want to upgrady everything to unstable only to test this ... > > Why is there no stable netatalk package? > > Because of licensing issues (spotted long time ago without solving, but > only at a recent reorganisation of the package noticed by ftpmasters and > - correctly - flagged as reason for removal from Debian until resolved): > https://bugs.debian.org/751121 Ah OK :-/ > > And why does my OSMC client also have problems with samba sharing > > speed on kernel 3.16? > > I don't know what OSMC is, but regardless I suspect that question is > better asked to the samba maintainers - or even better: upstream among > the samba developers. Yes of course, that question is to be ignored here :-) (OSMC -> Open Source Media Center, formerly known as XBMC) https://osmc.tv/ Jochen -- ZX81 - C64 - Amiga - x86-Linux - iMac (OS X)
