Hi, Matthias Klose <[email protected]> writes: > On 26.11.2015 02:04, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> lib64objc4-mips-cross_5.2.1-26cross1_all.deb: Built-Using refers to >> package gcc-5 (= 5.2.1-26) not in target archive ftp-master. > > gcc-5-ports is rejected because the package used for the build is not > yet accepted. This is sub-optimal. I understand that you don't want > to accept packages which are built against outdated packages, however > in this case a valid upload is rejected for administrative reasons.
Was the rejected upload also NEW? We require that Built-Using sources are in the target archive, though I guess for NEW packages having them in NEW might be okay too (but then they would have to be accepted in the right order or would get rejected at that stage). I don't want dak to copy things out of new in order to fulfill Built-Using dependencies. > And even if the gcc-5 upload is accepted, I'm not able to re-upload > the gcc-5-cross package without changing the md5sums/signature of the > package. Only the .changes needs to have a new signature. Ansgar
