Control: subscribe -1 j...@debian.org On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 08:26:45AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: libept1.4.16,libept1.5.0 > Version: libept1.4.16/1.0.14+b2 > Version: libept1.5.0/1.1+nmu2 > Severity: serious > User: trei...@debian.org > Usertags: edos-file-overwrite > > Date: 2015-11-28 > Architecture: amd64 > Distribution: sid > > Hi, > > automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the > same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has > detected the following problem:
That got ugly temporarily due to a binNMU that went wrong and produced a library with the wrong soname. We could probably Replace libept1.4.16 (= 1.0.14+b2) or something (and conflict with that build). The broken libept binNMU was in unstable for less than 24 hours though (excluding non-Linux ports, for which it still exists, because the current build FTBFS due to O_PATH being undefined, which is easy to fix). What do you think? -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. When replying, only quote what is necessary, and write each reply directly below the part(s) it pertains to (`inline'). Thank you.
