On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > > Even if your package is not directly to blame, I think it is important > > > to know how this happened and ensure that it will be fixed. > > > > I think the reason is that testing now has gfortran-5.2, and the elpa > > package in testing has not been rebuilt with it since. There was an > > elpa upload recently, but as it FTBFS on a few arches, it hasn't > > migrated yet. > > But we have Depends, Build-Depends, sonames, and all that. > > Is this a transition that we did wrong?
Well, we're missing handling of Fortran90 modules. We discussed it at DebConf15 with doko, but there's no programmatic way of encoding that in Build-Depends/Depends yet. Just stalling the GCC-5 transition wasn't an option, either, I guess. Michael
