On 30 November 2015 at 14:50, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote: | > Should we even consider not building at all? | | I think you should build it on arm64, where it could easily be useful. | | I'm not so sure about people using quantlib on armel systems, which | are typically very low-performance, but, seeing as it builds there | (without the tests), I don't see a reason to specially remove it.
Yes we have a proud history of wasting cpu cycles and disk space for installations and packages nobody ever uses ... but there is merit in running the builds. I turned on a -2 a while back, a fix should be forthcoming in a bit. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [email protected]
